No Such Thing as a Free Book

For its summer reading club, my department puts no restrictions on what kids may read. They don't have to read particular titles or genres, fiction or nonfiction. They don't have to read library books. They don't even have to read in the traditional manner; read-alouds and audiobooks count. The only thing we ask is that books be "right for them," "at their level," etc., and even that's on the honor system.

The lack of restrictions makes it easier for the kids (fewer rules to follow) and for staff and volunteers (fewer rules to enforce). It also taps into that wonderful, literacy-promoted practice known as free voluntary reading, the premise of which is that if people are free to choose their own reading material, they will enjoy reading more, which encourages them to read more and become better at reading. My opinion is that any assigned reading should stay in school; it's summer, for crying out loud!

So, this story from one of my coworkers irked me. She lives in another library district, and she took her 10-year-old son to the library to sign up for summer reading. The library in question requires that members read a certain number of fiction and a certain number of nonfiction books. Moreover, it requires that members spin a wheel to determine which shelf they can choose a book from.

Mom's eyebrows went up, but Son enjoyed spinning the wheel. They went into the stacks and found the corresponding shelf, and Son chose a book. He carried it back to the librarian's desk for approval. Whereupon the librarian told him it didn't count, even though he'd picked it off the specified shelf, because it was a comic book.

Oooh, it makes me mad just writing about it! Graphic novels and comics are legitimate literature that exercises and promotes literacy. I could not believe that after complying with all those restrictions, the boy's chosen book still didn't fit this library's notion of what constitutes summer reading.

My coworker's planning to write to the library director. My hope is that the librarian who shot down the comic book was acting under misinformation. But at too many libraries—public libraries— comics and graphic novels are still the red-headed stepchildren of "real" books.

Comments

Would he have been allowed to read American Born Chinese or Hugo Cabret (maybe he only would have been allowed to count the pages with text in Hugo C.)?

I think anyone who cops this attitude ought to be compelled to read Scott McCloud's excellent Understanding Comics (http://www.scottmccloud.com/store/books/uc.html). "Consuming" sequential art is reading. I am a convert (not necessarily a fanboy, but a respectful convert).

I will spare your comments my longer rant on incentivizing reading through quantity contests. We have a slow food movement. We need a slow reading movement. There are lots of books that deserve and require slow reading (MADAPPLE has been on my nightstand for a couple weeks). Are libraries like the one you cite even promoting literacy if it's all about the bookcount? Doesn't literacy imply comprehension and engagement with the text.

Didn't I say I wasn't going to rant?

Hee, you are remarkably restrained. This is definitely a don't-get-me-started issue for me, too.

My friend plans to specifically mention Hugo Cabret in her letter to the library director (he's on the young side for ABC, and I suggested a few other popular graphics-heavy books that would probably fly under the radar at this library (e.g., Diary of a Wimpy Kid).

The whole thing is stupid, any way you slice it-- though someone asked me, can the kids read wordless picture books for the program? I'm guessing my library's answer is still "yes"; I'm guessing the other library's is "no."

As for the matter of incentivizing reading... I have mixed feelings on that. I do think it helps some kids by encouraging them to read in a non-academic environment, while the prizes (free books) are simply a perk for kids who read a lot anyway. I think it also encourages some families to visit the library and read together more than they would normally. I *hope* those benefits outweigh the costs of incentivizing. But I don't know.

What troubles me more is parents who wig out over their kids not reaching the goal and demand an exception to the rules. They should help their kids feel good about the reading they *did* do. If the prize is that important to them, parents could make up the deficit by reading aloud or playing audiobooks in the car. But teaching kids that the incentive is so freaking important that they need to strong-arm the librarians into giving it to them-- *shudder.* It's great working in a well-educated, book-loving community, but the parental competiveness gets a bit rough sometimes.