Scribbling Around with Scrivener

I've been hearing about Scrivener for ages, but I only downloaded it this past week. I figured with the new year rolling around and a new round of rewrites to work on, I'd try something new.

On its website, Scrivener is described as "a word processor and project management tool created specifically for writers of long texts such as novels and research papers." It's not intended for making your final text look all pretty and print-ready; it's meant for all the ugly, scribbly, patchworky stuff up to that point. Oh, and it's for Mac OS X only.

The past few years, I've been using MacJournal for the drafting stage, then exporting it to our evil ally Microsoft Word for final edits and formatting. MacJournal, as the name suggests, is intended for journaling and related chronological writing activities such as blogging and podcasting. I've enjoyed using it because it allows you to create multiple journals (in my case, novel drafts) with multiple entries (chapters), making it much easier to segment and jump around between segments than an MS Word file of unholy length.

So far, what I'm liking more about Scrivener than MacJournal are its drag'n'drop capabilities. Since Scrivener is not fundamentally a chronological tool, it's much easier to reorder chapters and click between drafts/chapters, which is immensely helpful when working on a major revision. I also like the full-screen option, which allows you to see your document as an uncluttered expanse without buttons and your desktop/other applications cluttering up your peripheral view.

(In fairness to MacJournal, I haven't been running the very latest version, which definitely incorporates full-screen capabilities and may well have other nifty features to rival Scrivener's.)

There are a couple of differences from MacJournal in the export process I'm not crazy about, but (a) it may be that I just haven't yet figured out how to resolve them and (b) the inconviences are outweighed by the perks. For one thing, there doesn't seem to be a way of exporting all files in a project into one single file, without first "merging" them. For another, when you export a project, it creates a new folder with your files in it, instead of overwriting the old folder.

In terms of protecting exported files from being accidentally overwritten by the impulsive writer-type person, these are very good things. But as someone who backs up projects frequently and doesn't really *want* 50 zillion midstream versions cluttering up my harddrive, I find it annoying not to have the option of overwriting.

Scrivener has a lot of power that I haven't even touched. Right now I'm just using it for revising and drafting, but it has tools for gathering multimedia research, formatting screenplays, and other neat stuff. Best of all, you can try it for free for 30 days! After that, it's only 40 buckaroos, which I will gladly throw down if the next 24 days go as swimmingly as the first six.

Comments

I assume you know this, but Mr. Nerd has to say that Scrivener has a forum with a Wish List section. For some of these behaviors, assuming they're not in there, suggesting them to the developer(s) is always important. These indie folks live and die by that kind of feedback, and most of them in my experience are very receptive.

Mr. Nerd, I appreciate the suggestion! I'm going to spend some more time with it to see if I'm just overlooking these features, but I will keep the wish list in mind.